Red Knot, rufa subspecies (Calidris canutus). Photo credit: Mark Peck, Royal Ontario Museum
The “rufa” subspecies of Red Knot (Calidris canutus) travels from its breeding grounds in the Canadian Arctic to its winter habitat in South America and back each year, an incredible 15,000 kilometers each way. Its numbers have fallen precipitously in recent decades, and with such a broad range, determining what’s behind the shorebird’s decline is a huge challenge. A new study from The Condor: Ornithological Applications examines Red Knot nesting habitat preferences across the Arctic and maps those areas most suitable as breeding habitat. An understanding of species-habitat relationships will be crucial for present and future conservation efforts.
Unfortunately, the contemporary spatial distribution of Arctic breeding habitat for shorebirds is only coarsely defined. This situation was especially true for the rufa Knot. Starting back in 1999, Conserve Wildlife Foundation of New Jersey’s Larry Niles (Rutgers Ecology & Evolution PhD), Amanda Dey of the NJ Endangered & Nongame Species Program (Rutgers Ecology & Evolution PhD) and Rutgers University DEENR Professor Richard Lathrop, and their colleagues attached radio tags to 365 knots captured while migrating through Delaware Bay in 1999-2006. To learn where and in what sort of habitat the tagged birds nested, they then conducted surveys via small airplane across the south and central Canadian Arctic, a vast study area spanning from Victoria Island in the west to Baffin Island in the east. They also carried out detailed ground-based surveys on Nunavut’s Southampton Island. Across both scales, knots preferred to nest in sparsely vegetated areas on sedimentary bedrock, near but not directly adjacent to the coast or interior wetlands, to which they commute in order to forage.
Richard Lathrop in Southampton Island, Nunavut. Photo credit: Mark Peck, Royal Ontario Museum
“It took many person-hours over many years of intensive field surveys to find the several dozen occupied Red Knot nests that we located and documented,” says team leader Niles. Lead author on The Condor paper, Lathrop explains “Using the power of satellite remote sensing, data mining analysis, and geospatial modeling, we were able to extrapolate from the field and radio-telemetry surveys to map potential nesting habitat for these birds across wide expanses of the Canadian Arctic. These same tools and techniques could be applied to advance our knowledge about other Arctic-nesting shorebirds.”
The study shows that there are more than 74,000 square kilometers of suitable rufa Red Knot habitat across their Central Arctic breeding range–enough space for at least that many breeding pairs, assuming one square kilometer of territory per nest. Since the entire population currently numbers only around 42,000 individuals, it’s unlikely that a lack of available breeding habitat is contributing to the species’ decline; knots’ problems must lie elsewhere. However, suitable breeding conditions for a number of Arctic shorebirds, including knots, are predicted to shift and decline in coming decades due to climate change.
“Implementing effective conservation actions for long-distance migrant birds often involves the systematic elimination of insignificant factors to identify important biotic and abiotic contributors to population dynamics,” adds Brad Andres, National Coordinator for the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service’s Shorebird Conservation Plan, who was not involved in the study. “For the first time, Lathrop and his colleagues have described environmental conditions conducive for nesting by rufa Red Knots and provide evidence that breeding ground habitats are likely not limiting the recovery of the population. Their work also furnishes a baseline to evaluate the ability of a changing Arctic climate to provide breeding habitat for this shorebird of high conservation concern.”
Mapping and modeling the breeding habitat of the Red Knot, Calidris canutus, at landscape and regional scales was published August 1, 2018, at BioOne, The Condor 120(3):650-665. 2018
(issue URL http://www.bioone.org/toc/cond/120/3).
Source: Department of Ecology, Evolution, and Natural Resources
Photo credits: Mark Peck, Royal Ontario Museum
